Uncle Pai passed away a few days ago. He is the man who brought mythology to a whole generation of Indians through 'immortal picture books' or Amar Chitra Katha
Uncle Pai passed away a few days ago. He is the man who brought mythology to a whole generation of Indians through 'immortal picture books' or Amar Chitra Katha (ACK). I remember waiting for that monthly dose, admiring the art, relishing the story and imagining myself in those mythic worlds. Those moments came into my life because of this one man and for that I, and many more, will be eternally grateful. Had it not been for him, would I have immersed myself in mythology, I wonder?
In 1967, in a quiz contest, the children could answer questions from Greek and Roman mythology but they did not know the name of Ram's mother. This led to the creation of ACK.
Illustration / Devdutt Pattanaik
Today, things are not so bad, but I keep hearing this need to make mythology 'relevant' for the modern child.
Today, parents tell me that they buy ACK for their children, but the children prefer television. American and Japanese comics have overrun the child's imagination. ACK has tried going on television but the televised version does not have the same magic. The context has changed!
When ACK came into the lives of children, the only thing on television were the weekly black and white shows: Chayageet, Krishi-darshan, Marathi movies on Saturdays and Hindi movies on Sundays. Everything was controlled by the government. First, it was Mumbai Doordarshan, then it became National television. Today, the floodgates have opened. In the remotest village, thanks to Internet and cable television, one can access stories from around the world. Despite selling over 90 million copies in 20 languages, ACK faces a huge challenge. But parents cannot expect to outsource value-education to ACK alone.
In an attempt to make the story relevant, one gentleman called Gotham (Gautam?) in consultation, I am told, with Deepak Chopra and Shekar Kapur, created a series of comics imagining a futuristic Ramayana where Ram has a six-pack, Hanuman looks like an ape, and Dandaka looks like a dark Amazon jungle, and everyone looks like he/she has just attended a heavy metal concert. Somehow it does not feel like Ramayana, at all.
The greatest challenge, however, is not external. It is internal ufffd mythology itself. Most people assume mythology is parable, a story with a moral ending. It is not. Mythology is assumed to be prescriptive and instructive. It is not. Mythological tales are supposed to be reflective; they gently shape your view of life. ACK focussed on the narrative alone. The reflection was missing. No one wonders why a god has four hands or why a goddess kills a buffalo. The 1970s generation accepted the stories without question. Today's generation does not. They want to know why, and more importantly ufffd so what? Parents, who focussed on education that could get them jobs, are at their wits' end. How do they answer a question they had never considered?
We must never forget the visual impact of ACK. Even today, we imagine demons to be dark, heroes to be fair, Ram as clean shaven, heroines with no fat. The comics perpetrated Raja Ravi Verma's calendar art imagery and in doing so overshadowed traditional imagery found on ancient temple walls and medieval miniature paintings. Truth, I realise in hindsight, has a lot to do with cosmetics than we are willing to admit.
ADVERTISEMENT
The author is Chief Belief Officer of the Future Group, and can be reached at devdutt@devdutt.com
The views expressed in this column are the individual's and don't represent those of the paper.
