Supreme court to hear petitions challenging places of worship act today

The Supreme Court of India is set to hear a batch of petitions on Thursday challenging key provisions of the Places of Worship Special Provisions Act 1991 This Act mandates maintaining the religious character of all places of worship as they existed on August 15 1947 barring any legal proceedings to reclaim or alter their natureA special bench comprising Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna and Justices PV Sanjay Kumar and KV Vishwanathan will preside over the case at 330 pm todayAccording to ANI the petitions argue that the Act infringes on the constitutional rights of Hindus Jains Buddhists and Sikhs to reclaim and manage their religious sites many of which were allegedly altered or destroyed by invaders The petitioners claim that the Act violates the principles of secularism and the rule of law both integral to the ConstitutionProminent petitioners include Maharaja Kumari Krishna Priya daughter of the Kashi Royal Family BJP leader Subramanian Swamy former MP Chintamani Malviya retired army officer Anil Kabotra advocates Chandra Shekhar and Rudra Vikram Singh and religious leaders Swami Jeetendranand Saraswati and Devkinandan Thakur JiThey have challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 2 3 and 4 of the Act arguing that these provisions restrict their rights under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution which guarantee freedom to practice and manage religious affairs The petitions further assert that the Act violates Article 29 which safeguards cultural heritage by preventing communities from reclaiming religious sites of historical and cultural importanceThe Act enacted in 1991 explicitly prohibits the conversion of any place of worship Section 3 bars altering the religious character of a site while Section 4 disallows filing lawsuits or initiating legal proceedings to contest the status of a place of worship as of August 15 1947However the petitioners argue that this retrospective cutoff date is arbitrary and irrational They claim the law unfairly deprives certain communities of their rights while allowing others such as Muslims to reclaim properties under the Waqf ActANI reports that groups like the Jamiat UlamaiHind and the All India Muslim Personal Law Board have opposed these petitions They contend that entertaining these challenges could open a floodgate of litigation against countless mosques and other places of worship across IndiaThe Committee of Management of the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid responsible for the Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi has also filed an intervention application seeking dismissal of the petitions The management asserts that revisiting the Actrsquos provisions would destabilise the status quo and fuel communal tensionsOne petitioner highlighted a disparity within the Act itself which excludes the birthplace of Lord Rama but not that of Lord Krishna despite both being incarnations of Lord Vishnu According to ANI the petitions allege that the Act ldquoblatantly offendsrdquo the rights of Hindus Jains Buddhists and Sikhs to manage and administer their religious sites and seek judicial remedies for encroachmentsThe pleas further claim that the Act has curtailed their fundamental rights including the ability to acquire religious properties belonging to their deities The petitioners argue that such provisions effectively bar them from restoring places of worship that hold deep cultural and historical significanceWith inputs from ANI